Are We Safer?: Map – Your Local Fusion Center FRONTLINE: PBS
Map Your Local Fusion Center
Fusion centers — places for state, local and federal officials to share and analyze information — sprang up at the local level in the wake of the post-9/11 complaints about the failure to “connect the dots.” In 2003, the federal government began contributing funding; to date, the Department of Homeland Security has provided more than $420 million in funding to 72 fusion centers across the country, but some localities have funded additional centers.
Fusion centers are built upon the idea of cops on a beat — local authorities will recognize potential threats to their communities and feed the system with intelligence about possible terrorists. But critics charge that the imperative to gather as much information as possible can lead to abuses and misinformation that can get into national databases.
The Future Of The Internet
United States of Nazi
H.R.5741 Universal National Service Act
H.R.5741 — Universal National Service Act (Introduced in House – IH)
HR 5741 IH
111th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 5741
To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 15, 2010
Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services
A BILL
To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, and for other purposes.
- Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
- (a) Short Title- This Act may be cited as the `Universal National Service Act’.
- (b) Table of Contents- The table of contents for this Act is as follows:
- Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
TITLE I–NATIONAL SERVICE
- Sec. 101. Definitions.
- Sec. 102. National service obligation.
- Sec. 103. Induction to perform national service.
- Sec. 104. Two-year period of national service.
- Sec. 105. Implementation by the President.
- Sec. 106. Examination and classification of persons.
- Sec. 107. Deferments and postponements.
- Sec. 108. Induction exemptions.
- Sec. 109. Conscientious objection.
- Sec. 110. Discharge following national service.
TITLE II–AMENDMENTS TO MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE ACT
- Sec. 201. Registration of females.
- Sec. 202. Registration and induction authority.
TITLE I–NATIONAL SERVICE
SEC. 101. DEFINITIONS.
- In this title:
- (1) The term `contingency operation’ has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code.
- (2) The term `military service’ means service performed as a member of an active or reserve component of the uniformed services.
- (3) The term `national service’ means military service or service in a civilian capacity that, as determined by the President, promotes the national defense, including national or community service and service related to homeland security.
- (4) The term `Secretary concerned’ means the Secretary of Defense with respect to the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps, the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard, the Secretary of Commerce, with respect to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, with respect to the Public Health Service.
- (5) The term `United States’, when used in a geographical sense, means the several States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam.
- (6) The term `uniformed services’ means the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, commissioned corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and commissioned corps of the Public Health Service.
SEC. 102. NATIONAL SERVICE OBLIGATION.
- (a) Obligation for Service- It is the obligation of every citizen of the United States, and every other person residing in the United States, who is between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform a period of national service as prescribed in this title unless exempted under the provisions of this title.
- (b) Forms of National Service- The national service obligation under this title shall be performed either–
- (1) as a member of an active or reserve component of the uniformed services; or
- (2) in a civilian capacity that, as determined by the President, promotes the national defense, including national or community service and service related to homeland security.
- (c) Age Limits- A person may be inducted under this title only if the person has attained the age of 18 and has not attained the age of 42.
SEC. 103. INDUCTION TO PERFORM NATIONAL SERVICE.
- (a) Induction Requirements- The President shall provide for the induction of persons described in section 102(a) to perform their national service obligation.
- (b) Limitation on Induction for Military Service- Persons described in section 102(a) may be inducted to perform military service only if–
- (1) a declaration of war is in effect;
- (2) the President declares a national emergency, which the President determines necessitates the induction of persons to perform military service, and immediately informs Congress of the reasons for the declaration and the need to induct persons for military service; or
- (3) members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps are engaged in a contingency operation pursuant to a congressional authorization for the use of military force.
- (c) Limitation on Number of Persons Inducted for Military Service- When the induction of persons for military service is authorized by subsection (b), the President shall determine the number of persons described in section 102(a) whose national service obligation is to be satisfied through military service based on–
- (1) the authorized end strengths of the uniformed services;
- (2) the feasibility of the uniformed services to recruit sufficient volunteers to achieve such end-strength levels; and
- (3) provide a mechanism for the random selection of persons to be inducted to perform military service.
- (d) Selection for Induction-
- (1) RANDOM SELECTION FOR MILITARY SERVICE- When the induction of persons for military service is authorized by subsection (b), the President shall utilize a mechanism for the random selection of persons to be inducted to perform military service.
- (2) CIVILIAN SERVICE- Persons described in section 102(a) who do not volunteer to perform military service or are not inducted for military service shall perform their national service obligation in a civilian capacity pursuant to section 102(b)(2).
- (e) Voluntary Service- A person subject to induction under this title may–
- (1) volunteer to perform national service in lieu of being inducted; or
- (2) request permission to be inducted at a time other than the time at which the person is otherwise called for induction.
SEC. 104. TWO-YEAR PERIOD OF NATIONAL SERVICE.
- (a) General Rule- Except as otherwise provided in this section, the period of national service performed by a person under this title shall be two years.
- (b) Grounds for Extension- At the discretion of the President, the period of military service for a member of the uniformed services under this title may be extended–
- (1) with the consent of the member, for the purpose of furnishing hospitalization, medical, or surgical care for injury or illness incurred in line of duty; or
- (2) for the purpose of requiring the member to compensate for any time lost to training for any cause.
- (c) Early Termination- The period of national service for a person under this title shall be terminated before the end of such period under the following circumstances:
- (1) The voluntary enlistment and active service of the person in an active or reserve component of the uniformed services for a period of at least two years, in which case the period of basic military training and education actually served by the person shall be counted toward the term of enlistment.
- (2) The admission and service of the person as a cadet or midshipman at the United States Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, the United States Air Force Academy, the Coast Guard Academy, or the United States Merchant Marine Academy.
- (3) The enrollment and service of the person in an officer candidate program, if the person has signed an agreement to accept a Reserve commission in the appropriate service with an obligation to serve on active duty if such a commission is offered upon completion of the program.
- (4) Such other grounds as the President may establish.
SEC. 105. IMPLEMENTATION BY THE PRESIDENT.
- (a) In General- The President shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out this title.
- (b) Matter To Be Covered by Regulations- Such regulations shall include specification of the following:
- (1) The types of civilian service that may be performed in order for a person to satisfy the person’s national service obligation under this title.
- (2) Standards for satisfactory performance of civilian service and of penalties for failure to perform civilian service satisfactorily.
- (3) The manner in which persons shall be selected for induction under this title, including the manner in which those selected will be notified of such selection.
- (4) All other administrative matters in connection with the induction of persons under this title and the registration, examination, and classification of such persons.
- (5) A means to determine questions or claims with respect to inclusion for, or exemption or deferment from induction under this title, including questions of conscientious objection.
- (6) Standards for compensation and benefits for persons performing their national service obligation under this title through civilian service.
- (7) Such other matters as the President determines necessary to carry out this title.
- (c) Use of Prior Act- To the extent determined appropriate by the President, the President may use for purposes of this title the procedures provided in the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.), including procedures for registration, selection, and induction.
SEC. 106. EXAMINATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF PERSONS.
- (a) Examination- Every person subject to induction under this title shall, before induction, be physically and mentally examined and shall be classified as to fitness to perform national service.
- (b) Different Classification Standards- The President may apply different classification standards for fitness for military service and fitness for civilian service.
SEC. 107. DEFERMENTS AND POSTPONEMENTS.
- (a) High School Students- A person who is pursuing a standard course of study, on a full-time basis, in a secondary school or similar institution of learning shall be entitled to have induction under this title postponed until the person–
- (1) obtains a high school diploma;
- (2) ceases to pursue satisfactorily such course of study; or
- (3) attains the age of 20.
- (b) Hardship and Disability- Deferments from national service under this title may be made for–
- (1) extreme hardship; or
- (2) physical or mental disability.
- (c) Training Capacity- The President may postpone or suspend the induction of persons for military service under this title as necessary to limit the number of persons receiving basic military training and education to the maximum number that can be adequately trained.
- (d) Termination- No deferment or postponement of induction under this title shall continue after the cause of such deferment or postponement ceases.
SEC. 108. INDUCTION EXEMPTIONS.
- (a) Qualifications- No person may be inducted for military service under this title unless the person is acceptable to the Secretary concerned for training and meets the same health and physical qualifications applicable under section 505 of title 10, United States Code, to persons seeking original enlistment in a regular component of the Armed Forces.
- (b) Other Military Service- No person shall be liable for induction under this title who–
- (1) is serving, or has served honorably for at least six months, in any component of the uniformed services on active duty; or
- (2) is or becomes a cadet or midshipman at the United States Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, the United States Air Force Academy, the Coast Guard Academy, the United States Merchant Marine Academy, a midshipman of a Navy accredited State maritime academy, a member of the Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps, or the naval aviation college program, so long as that person satisfactorily continues in and completes at least two years training therein.
SEC. 109. CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION.
- (a) Claims as Conscientious Objector- Nothing in this title shall be construed to require a person to be subject to combatant training and service in the uniformed services, if that person, by reason of sincerely held moral, ethical, or religious beliefs, is conscientiously opposed to participation in war in any form.
- (b) Alternative Noncombatant or Civilian Service- A person who claims exemption from combatant training and service under subsection (a) and whose claim is sustained by the local board shall–
- (1) be assigned to noncombatant service (as defined by the President), if the person is inducted into the uniformed services; or
- (2) be ordered by the local board, if found to be conscientiously opposed to participation in such noncombatant service, to perform national civilian service for the period specified in section 104(a) and subject to such regulations as the President may prescribe.
SEC. 110. DISCHARGE FOLLOWING NATIONAL SERVICE.
- (a) Discharge- Upon completion or termination of the obligation to perform national service under this title, a person shall be discharged from the uniformed services or from civilian service, as the case may be, and shall not be subject to any further service under this title.
- (b) Coordination With Other Authorities- Nothing in this section shall limit or prohibit the call to active service in the uniformed services of any person who is a member of a regular or reserve component of the uniformed services.
TITLE II–AMENDMENTS TO MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE ACT
SEC. 201. REGISTRATION OF FEMALES.
- (a) Registration Required- Section 3(a) of the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. 453(a)) is amended–
- (1) by striking `male’ both places it appears;
- (2) by inserting `or herself’ after `himself’; and
- (3) by striking `he’ and inserting `the person’.
- (b) Conforming Amendment- Section 16(a) of the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 466(a)) is amended by striking `men’ and inserting `persons’.
SEC. 202. REGISTRATION AND INDUCTION AUTHORITY.
- (a) Registration- Section 4 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 454) is amended by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection:
- `(h) This section does not apply with respect to the induction of persons into the Armed Forces pursuant to the Universal National Service Act.’.
- (b) Induction- Section 17(c) of the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 467(c)) is amended by striking `now or hereafter’ and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting `inducted pursuant to the Universal National Service Act.’.
I have been tortured by your corrupt system far to long
When will some one care about helping me and not taking my non existent money.
I have nothing left I am hungry and don’t know how to pay the bills any more. But those that are supposed to help me have what I need and they go about their way as if i don’t even exist if I cant pay.
I have been tortured by your corrupt anti man system far to long. It has cost me my family, my children, their and my future, no one cares. It is cruel and inhuman to the point of sickness years of lies and theft goes unanswered, yet all stand by and watch me drown and relish the fact that if I could pay it would be different.
Will some one finally do something?
I doubt it.
WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OFF NAZI!! Infiltrate all ‘conspiracy theorists’
ya know, the one thing that is killing freedom is the press and the way they side things for mindless consumer consumption. Like its either democrats or repubs that r right. But the one fact no one seems to understand is that both sides r screwing the public, and the public are stupid enough to take political sides instead of the side of the people…. I dont get it at all!
WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF NAZI !
Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all ‘conspiracy theorists’
Presidential adviser wrote about crackdown on expressing opinions
Posted: January 14, 2010
12:30 am Eastern
By Aaron Klein
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
function legalChars(input,fieldName){ var tfld = input.value.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/, ”); // value of field with whitespace trimmed off var illegalChars= /[\(\)\\,\;\:\”\[\]]/ ; if (tfld.match(illegalChars)) { alert(‘Please enter valid characters in your ‘+fieldName+’.’); input.focus(); return false; } return true;}function mandatoryText(input,fieldName){ if(input.value == ” || input == null){ alert(‘Please enter your ‘+fieldName+’.’); input.focus(); return false; } else { return true; }}function validEmail(field,fieldName) { with (field) { apos=value.indexOf(“@”); dotpos=value.lastIndexOf(“.”); if (apos<1||dotpos-apos<2) { alert('Please enter a valid '+fieldName+'.'); return false; } } var emailFilter = /^[^@]+@[^@.]+\.[^@]*\w\w$/ ; if (!emailFilter.test(field.value)) { //test email for illegal characters alert('Please enter well-formed '+fieldName+'.'); input.focus(); return false; } return true;}function checkSignup(newsletterCheckbox,thisNewsletter) { var inputs = document.emvForm.getElementsByTagName('input'); for (var i=0; i < inputs.length; i++) { if (inputs[i].getAttribute('type') == 'hidden') { if (newsletterCheckbox.checked == true) { if (inputs[i].value == '') {inputs[i].value = 'X';} } else { if (inputs[i].value == 'X') {inputs[i].value = '';} } if (inputs[i].name == thisNewsletter.name) {inputs[i].value = 'X';} } }}function validForm(){ if(!mandatoryText(document.getElementById('FIRSTNAME_FIELD'), 'First Name')) return; if(!legalChars(document.getElementById('FIRSTNAME_FIELD'), 'First Name')) return; if(!mandatoryText(document.getElementById('LASTNAME_FIELD'), 'Last Name')) return; if(!legalChars(document.getElementById('LASTNAME_FIELD'), 'Last Name')) return; if(!validEmail(document.getElementById('EMAIL_FIELD'), 'Email')) return; if(!legalChars(document.getElementById('POSTAL_CODE_FIELD'), 'Postal Code')) return; document.getElementById('emvForm').submit();}
 Cass Sunstein, huge fuckin asshole and Nazi! lets all try to get his ass sent to Guantanamo ! |
In a lengthy academic paper, President Obama’s regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban “conspiracy theorizing.”Among the beliefs Sunstein would ban is advocating that the theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.Sunstein also recommended the government send agents to infiltrate “extremists who supply conspiracy theories” to disrupt the efforts of the “extremists” to propagate their theories.In a 2008 Harvard law paper, “Conspiracy Theories,” Sunstein and co-author Adrian Vermeule, a Harvard law professor, ask, “What can government do about conspiracy theories?””We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.”In the 30-page paper – obtained and reviewed by WND – Sunstein argues the best government response to “conspiracy theories” is “cognitive infiltration of extremist groups.”(Story continues below)
| GA_googleFillSlot(“WND_NWS_C0200”); | GA_googleFillSlot(“WND_NWS_C0201”); |
Continued Sunstein: “We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity.”
Read more about Cass Sunstein’s agenda in “Shut Up, America!: The End of Free Speech”
Sunstein said government agents “might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.”
Sunstein defined a conspiracy theory as “an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role.”
Some “conspiracy theories” recommended for ban by Sunstein include:
- “The theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.”
- “The view that the Central Intelligence Agency was responsible for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.”
- “The 1996 crash of TWA flight 800 was caused by a U.S. military missile.”
- “The Trilateral Commission is responsible for important movements of the international economy.”
- “That Martin Luther King Jr. was killed by federal agents.”
- “The moon landing was staged and never actually occurred.”
Sunstein allowed that “some conspiracy theories, under our definition, have turned out to be true.”
He continued: “The Watergate hotel room used by Democratic National Committee was, in fact, bugged by Republican officials, operating at the behest of the White House. In the 1950s, the CIA did, in fact, administer LSD and related drugs under Project MKULTRA, in an effort to investigate the possibility of ‘mind control.’”
Sunstein’s paper advocating against the belief that global warming is a deliberate fraud was written before November’s climate scandal in which e-mails hacked from the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University in the U.K. indicate top climate researchers conspired to rig data and keep researchers with dissenting views from publishing in leading scientific journals.
Sunstein: Ban ‘right wing’ rumors
Sunstein’s paper is not the first time he has advocated banning the free flow of information.
WND reported that in a recently released book, “On Rumors,” Sunstein argued websites should be obliged to remove “false rumors” while libel laws should be altered to make it easier to sue for spreading such “rumors.”
In the 2009 book, Sunstein cited as a primary example of “absurd” and “hateful” remarks, reports by “right-wing websites” alleging an association between President Obama and Weatherman terrorist William Ayers.
He also singled out radio talker Sean Hannity for “attacking” Obama regarding the president’s “alleged associations.”
Ayers became a name in the 2008 presidential campaign when it was disclosed he worked closely with Obama for years. Obama also was said to have launched his political career at a 1995 fundraiser in Ayers’ apartment.
‘New Deal Fairness Doctrine’
WND also previously reported Sunstein drew up a “First Amendment New Deal” – a new “Fairness Doctrine” that would include the establishment of a panel of “nonpartisan experts” to ensure “diversity of view” on the airwaves.
Sunstein compared the need for the government to regulate broadcasting to the moral obligation the U.S. had to impose new rules that outlawed segregation.
Sunstein’s radical proposal, set forth in his 1993 book “The Partial Constitution,” received no news media attention and scant scrutiny until the WND report.
In the book, Sunstein outwardly favors and promotes the “Fairness Doctrine,” the abolished FCC policy that required holders of broadcast licenses to present controversial issues of public importance in a manner the government deemed “equitable and balanced.”
Sunstein introduces what he terms his “First Amendment New Deal” to regulate broadcasting in the U.S.
His proposal, which focuses largely on television, includes a government requirement that “purely commercial stations provide financial subsidies to public television or to commercial stations that agree to provide less profitable but high-quality programming.”
Sunstein wrote it is “worthwhile to consider more dramatic approaches as well.”
He proposes “compulsory public-affairs programming, right of reply, content review by nonpartisan experts or guidelines to encourage attention to public issues and diversity of view.”
The Obama czar argues his regulation proposals for broadcasting are actually presented within the spirit of the Constitution.
“It seems quite possible that a law that contained regulatory remedies would promote rather than undermine the ‘freedom of speech,'” he writes.
Writes Sunstein: “The idea that government should be neutral among all forms of speech seems right in the abstract, but as frequently applied it is no more plausible than the idea that it should be neutral between the associational interests of blacks and those of whites under conditions of segregation.”
Sunstein contends the landmark case that brought about the Fairness Doctrine, Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, “stresses not the autonomy of broadcasters (made possible only by current ownership rights), but instead the need to promote democratic self-government by ensuring that people are presented with a broad range of views about public issues.”
He continues: “In a market system, this goal may be compromised. It is hardly clear that ‘the freedom of speech’ is promoted by a regime in which people are permitted to speak only if other people are willing to pay enough to allow them to be heard.”
In his book, Sunstein slams the U.S. courts’ unwillingness to “require something like a Fairness Doctrine” to be a result of “the judiciary’s lack of democratic pedigree, lack of fact-finding powers and limited remedial authority.”
He clarifies he is not arguing the government should be free to regulate broadcasting however it chooses.
“Regulation designed to eliminate a particular viewpoint would of course be out of bounds. All viewpoint discrimination would be banned,” Sunstein writes.
But, he says, “at the very least, regulative ‘fairness doctrines’ would raise no real doubts” constitutionally.
Thanks to: Susie Quint
Stan Meyer – It Runs On Water
Stan Meyer – It Runs On Water
50:25 – 2 years ago
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=871102105173074920&hl=en&fs=true
Full Version of Equinox It runs on Water, Hydrogen Oxygen ( HHO ) – Zero Point Energy.
Have you ever thought about water as a fuel source?
The atomic make up of water makes the molecule perfect for a fuel source. The water molecule is composed of two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen. When the water molecule is separated into its component atoms (H and O) and oxidized as fuel, the resulting energy is two and one half times more powerful than gasoline. The byproduct of the combustion is water vapor. Making water as a fuel, powerful and pollution free!
The problem has always been how to separate water economically. Traditional methods of separating the bond of the water molecule have resulted in failure. To power a car by these methods would not move the car very far. The car?s electrical system could not recharge from the process quickly enough. The result would be a quickly drained battery. For many years Stanley Meyer researched this problem and found a way around it!
There are many people, as you could well imagine, who would not like to see this technology appear in the market place.
Stanley A. Meyer died on March 27 1998 at the young age of 57. It is vital that his research and resulting technological advances are not lost, but rather that his work is continued.
WIKI: Stanley Meyer’s water fuel cell
Stanley MEYER Water Fuel Cell
PESWiki.com — Pure Energy Systems Wiki:
I will be trying to post a few movies made by Stan Mayer before his death.
http://www.google.com/Stan+Meyer
http://www.google.com/stan+meyer+death
<a href=”http://www.google.com/stan+meyer+death”>Google Error Not Found The requested URL /stan+meyer+death was not found on this server.</a>
MAKES YA WANA GO HUMMM
United Nations – A Look Into The Future
United Nations – A Look Into The Future 30:27 – 2 years ago
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=-1340194041045838042&hl=en&fs=true
JBS documentary. The truth about United Nations intentions.
Letter to the head of social services
Freeman Perspective E2- Columbia the Illuminati Goddess
52:00 – 3 years ago
mazanga 