Did we really land Men on the Moon?
WIKI “Different Moon landing conspiracy theories claim that some or all elements of the Apollo Project and the associated Moon landings were falsifications staged by NASA and members of other organizations. Since the conclusion of the Apollo program, a number of related accounts espousing a belief that the landings were faked in some fashion have been advanced by various groups and individuals. Some of the more notable of these various claims include allegations that the Apollo astronauts did not set foot on the Moon; instead NASA and others intentionally deceived the public into believing the landings did occur by manufacturing, destroying, or tampering with evidence, including photos, telemetry tapes, transmissions, and rock samples.”CBC – The CIAs Secret War
repeating Monday May 28 at 10pm PT on CBC Newsworld
When several CIA airplanes suspiciously land in northern Poland, it raises questions about CIA activities in Europe. In Macedonia, a German citizen claims he was abducted and held prisoner in Kabul for five months by U.S. agents. Is there evidence these strange activities took place? The CIA’s Secret War provides proof, for the first time, that these abductions and confinements are no coincidence, but the result of political decisions to use information obtained through torture in countries where torture is standard practice.
Taking viewers into the heart of a troubling European parliamentary inquiry-an inquiry that in many ways parallels Canada’s own Maher Arar inquiry-The CIA’s Secret War sparks a debate on the role of democratic nations in the “war on terror”. The CIA’s Secret War is directed by Arnaud Muller and Steve Baumann.
WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OFF NAZI!! Infiltrate all ‘conspiracy theorists’
ya know, the one thing that is killing freedom is the press and the way they side things for mindless consumer consumption. Like its either democrats or repubs that r right. But the one fact no one seems to understand is that both sides r screwing the public, and the public are stupid enough to take political sides instead of the side of the people…. I dont get it at all!
WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF NAZI !
Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all ‘conspiracy theorists’
Presidential adviser wrote about crackdown on expressing opinions
Posted: January 14, 2010
12:30 am Eastern
By Aaron Klein
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
function legalChars(input,fieldName){ var tfld = input.value.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/, ”); // value of field with whitespace trimmed off var illegalChars= /[\(\)\\,\;\:\”\[\]]/ ; if (tfld.match(illegalChars)) { alert(‘Please enter valid characters in your ‘+fieldName+’.’); input.focus(); return false; } return true;}function mandatoryText(input,fieldName){ if(input.value == ” || input == null){ alert(‘Please enter your ‘+fieldName+’.’); input.focus(); return false; } else { return true; }}function validEmail(field,fieldName) { with (field) { apos=value.indexOf(“@”); dotpos=value.lastIndexOf(“.”); if (apos<1||dotpos-apos<2) { alert('Please enter a valid '+fieldName+'.'); return false; } } var emailFilter = /^[^@]+@[^@.]+\.[^@]*\w\w$/ ; if (!emailFilter.test(field.value)) { //test email for illegal characters alert('Please enter well-formed '+fieldName+'.'); input.focus(); return false; } return true;}function checkSignup(newsletterCheckbox,thisNewsletter) { var inputs = document.emvForm.getElementsByTagName('input'); for (var i=0; i < inputs.length; i++) { if (inputs[i].getAttribute('type') == 'hidden') { if (newsletterCheckbox.checked == true) { if (inputs[i].value == '') {inputs[i].value = 'X';} } else { if (inputs[i].value == 'X') {inputs[i].value = '';} } if (inputs[i].name == thisNewsletter.name) {inputs[i].value = 'X';} } }}function validForm(){ if(!mandatoryText(document.getElementById('FIRSTNAME_FIELD'), 'First Name')) return; if(!legalChars(document.getElementById('FIRSTNAME_FIELD'), 'First Name')) return; if(!mandatoryText(document.getElementById('LASTNAME_FIELD'), 'Last Name')) return; if(!legalChars(document.getElementById('LASTNAME_FIELD'), 'Last Name')) return; if(!validEmail(document.getElementById('EMAIL_FIELD'), 'Email')) return; if(!legalChars(document.getElementById('POSTAL_CODE_FIELD'), 'Postal Code')) return; document.getElementById('emvForm').submit();}
 Cass Sunstein, huge fuckin asshole and Nazi! lets all try to get his ass sent to Guantanamo ! |
In a lengthy academic paper, President Obama’s regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban “conspiracy theorizing.”Among the beliefs Sunstein would ban is advocating that the theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.Sunstein also recommended the government send agents to infiltrate “extremists who supply conspiracy theories” to disrupt the efforts of the “extremists” to propagate their theories.In a 2008 Harvard law paper, “Conspiracy Theories,” Sunstein and co-author Adrian Vermeule, a Harvard law professor, ask, “What can government do about conspiracy theories?””We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.”In the 30-page paper – obtained and reviewed by WND – Sunstein argues the best government response to “conspiracy theories” is “cognitive infiltration of extremist groups.”(Story continues below)
| GA_googleFillSlot(“WND_NWS_C0200”); | GA_googleFillSlot(“WND_NWS_C0201”); |
Continued Sunstein: “We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity.”
Read more about Cass Sunstein’s agenda in “Shut Up, America!: The End of Free Speech”
Sunstein said government agents “might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.”
Sunstein defined a conspiracy theory as “an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role.”
Some “conspiracy theories” recommended for ban by Sunstein include:
- “The theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.”
- “The view that the Central Intelligence Agency was responsible for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.”
- “The 1996 crash of TWA flight 800 was caused by a U.S. military missile.”
- “The Trilateral Commission is responsible for important movements of the international economy.”
- “That Martin Luther King Jr. was killed by federal agents.”
- “The moon landing was staged and never actually occurred.”
Sunstein allowed that “some conspiracy theories, under our definition, have turned out to be true.”
He continued: “The Watergate hotel room used by Democratic National Committee was, in fact, bugged by Republican officials, operating at the behest of the White House. In the 1950s, the CIA did, in fact, administer LSD and related drugs under Project MKULTRA, in an effort to investigate the possibility of ‘mind control.’”
Sunstein’s paper advocating against the belief that global warming is a deliberate fraud was written before November’s climate scandal in which e-mails hacked from the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University in the U.K. indicate top climate researchers conspired to rig data and keep researchers with dissenting views from publishing in leading scientific journals.
Sunstein: Ban ‘right wing’ rumors
Sunstein’s paper is not the first time he has advocated banning the free flow of information.
WND reported that in a recently released book, “On Rumors,” Sunstein argued websites should be obliged to remove “false rumors” while libel laws should be altered to make it easier to sue for spreading such “rumors.”
In the 2009 book, Sunstein cited as a primary example of “absurd” and “hateful” remarks, reports by “right-wing websites” alleging an association between President Obama and Weatherman terrorist William Ayers.
He also singled out radio talker Sean Hannity for “attacking” Obama regarding the president’s “alleged associations.”
Ayers became a name in the 2008 presidential campaign when it was disclosed he worked closely with Obama for years. Obama also was said to have launched his political career at a 1995 fundraiser in Ayers’ apartment.
‘New Deal Fairness Doctrine’
WND also previously reported Sunstein drew up a “First Amendment New Deal” – a new “Fairness Doctrine” that would include the establishment of a panel of “nonpartisan experts” to ensure “diversity of view” on the airwaves.
Sunstein compared the need for the government to regulate broadcasting to the moral obligation the U.S. had to impose new rules that outlawed segregation.
Sunstein’s radical proposal, set forth in his 1993 book “The Partial Constitution,” received no news media attention and scant scrutiny until the WND report.
In the book, Sunstein outwardly favors and promotes the “Fairness Doctrine,” the abolished FCC policy that required holders of broadcast licenses to present controversial issues of public importance in a manner the government deemed “equitable and balanced.”
Sunstein introduces what he terms his “First Amendment New Deal” to regulate broadcasting in the U.S.
His proposal, which focuses largely on television, includes a government requirement that “purely commercial stations provide financial subsidies to public television or to commercial stations that agree to provide less profitable but high-quality programming.”
Sunstein wrote it is “worthwhile to consider more dramatic approaches as well.”
He proposes “compulsory public-affairs programming, right of reply, content review by nonpartisan experts or guidelines to encourage attention to public issues and diversity of view.”
The Obama czar argues his regulation proposals for broadcasting are actually presented within the spirit of the Constitution.
“It seems quite possible that a law that contained regulatory remedies would promote rather than undermine the ‘freedom of speech,'” he writes.
Writes Sunstein: “The idea that government should be neutral among all forms of speech seems right in the abstract, but as frequently applied it is no more plausible than the idea that it should be neutral between the associational interests of blacks and those of whites under conditions of segregation.”
Sunstein contends the landmark case that brought about the Fairness Doctrine, Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, “stresses not the autonomy of broadcasters (made possible only by current ownership rights), but instead the need to promote democratic self-government by ensuring that people are presented with a broad range of views about public issues.”
He continues: “In a market system, this goal may be compromised. It is hardly clear that ‘the freedom of speech’ is promoted by a regime in which people are permitted to speak only if other people are willing to pay enough to allow them to be heard.”
In his book, Sunstein slams the U.S. courts’ unwillingness to “require something like a Fairness Doctrine” to be a result of “the judiciary’s lack of democratic pedigree, lack of fact-finding powers and limited remedial authority.”
He clarifies he is not arguing the government should be free to regulate broadcasting however it chooses.
“Regulation designed to eliminate a particular viewpoint would of course be out of bounds. All viewpoint discrimination would be banned,” Sunstein writes.
But, he says, “at the very least, regulative ‘fairness doctrines’ would raise no real doubts” constitutionally.
Thanks to: Susie Quint
Bill H R 6166 End Of Constitution
Bill H R 6166 End Of Constitution
United Nations – A Look Into The Future
United Nations – A Look Into The Future 30:27 – 2 years ago
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=-1340194041045838042&hl=en&fs=true
JBS documentary. The truth about United Nations intentions.
The Iron Triangle – The Carlyle Group Exposed
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=7094545816220336237&hl=en&fs=true
The Bush family, the Saudi Royal family, Osama Bin Laden’s family and Donald Rumsfeld’s inner circle – these are just some of the high profile figures who have played a direct role in the rise of one of the most powerful and influential and secretive firms in Washington. The company is called The Carlyle Group. And in the wake of the events of September 11th and the invasion of Iraq, its power and influence have become significantly stronger. The company operates within the so-called iron-triangle of industry, government and the military. Its list of former and current advisers and associates includes a vast array of some of the most powerful men in America and indeed around the world. This program exposes the history of the Carlyle Group, from it’s inception as a private equity firm to it’s percent status as one of the largest defense contractors in the world. THE LIGHTBRINGERS: The Emissaries of Jahbulon
THE LIGHTBRINGERS: The Emissaries of Jahbulon
(History of Freemasonry) 53:21 – 4 years ago
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=7652891847477492406&hl=en&fs=true
This film by Jüri Lina tells about what kind of light and how the Emissaries of Jahbulon spread it around themselves and how it affects us. An exciting excursion to some of the most powerful Masonic lodges in the United States and in Europe.
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW ALL THERE IS TO KNOW ABOUT THE HISTORY OF THE MASONS, FREEMASONS WATCH THIS FILM!
A tour of the lavish Washington, D.C. temple of the Freemason Mammoth sphinxes guard the House of the Temple of the Scottish Rite, a formidable neo-Classical building in the heart of Washington, D.C. Inside, Egyptian hieroglyphics adorn a soaring atrium. The building’s nine-foot-thick walls hold human remains. Bronze coiling snakes flank a large wooden throne, canopied in purple velvet, in a second-floor inner sanctum called the Temple Room, where men from around the world gather behind closed doors every two years. Over the centuries the select membership has included signers of the Declaration of Independence; George Washington, Theodore Roosevelt, Gerald Ford and 13 other presidents; Senators Charles Schumer and Robert Dole; Chief Justice Earl Warren and other Supreme Court justices. Formally they are known as Freemasons, but most people know them simply as Masons. And this artfully forbidding edifice, a mile from the White House, is their southern headquarters.
Long viewed by outsiders as a mysterious society and one of the world’s most powerful fraternities, Masons have recently become the object of even more curiosity as filmmakers and novelists mine Masonic legends and symbols for the stuff of conspiracy. In the 2004 thriller National Treasure, Nicolas Cage followed Masonic clues and invisible writing on the Declaration of Independence in search of a hidden cache of gold. Dan Brown, author of The Da Vinci Code, has said his next novel would involve Masonic architecture in Washington, D.C. His Web site challenges readers to find Masonic clues on the dust jacket of The Da Vinci Code. Perhaps because of such intrigue, the number of visitors to the temple has tripled over the past two years to 12,000.
Which shows that Masons have nothing to hide, says retired Maj. Gen. Armen Garabedian, a Mason for 49 years. “This secret thing stems from way back,” he says. “If we were a secret organization, tours would not be offered.” The temple has always been open to the public.
By the early 1800s, actual tools of masonry, such as the compass and surveyor’s square, had come to symbolize building one’s own spiritual temple through virtue and discipline. The House of the Temple abounds in ancient, if not always interpretable, symbols, from the 17-ton sphinxes flanking the entrance to nine-point stars, two-headed eagles and images of the Greek god Hermes. A stained-glass window bears the ancient Egyptian “all-seeing eye,” which, theorists of Freemason conspiracies like to note, also appears on the Great Seal of the United States, designed in 1782, and the dollar bill, which acquired the ocular icon in 1935, thanks to FDR, a Mason.
AdvertisementCompleted in 1915, the House of the Temple was designed by James Russell Pope, architect of other notable Washington buildings, including the National Gallery of Art (1941) and the Jefferson Memorial (1943). “The temple launched Pope’s career in Washington,” says Paul Dolinsky, head of the Historic American Buildings Survey. “It became one of the most respected classical designs in the world at the time.” Dolinsky says the Temple Room’s gilded serpents and velvet drapings remind him of the set of the 1934 epic Cleopatra. “Cecil B. DeMille meets Freemasonry,” he says. “It’s really a larger-than-life Hollywood set.”Modeled on a Greek-style temple, the building contains no metal girders—just stone, as the ancients would have constructed it. The massive limestone facade is ringed with 33 Ionic columns. The number 33 proliferates in Masonic ritual, but the group’s historians say they don’t know what it symbolized originally. The dark green marble floors of the atrium lead to a grand staircase and a bust of Scottish Rite leader Albert Pike, a former Confederate general who spent 32 years developing Masonic rituals. Pike remains a controversial figure, with detractors alleging that he was a member of the Ku Klux Klan and a Satanist. In 1944 the Masons, by an act of Congress, gained permission to dig up Pike’s remains from a local cemetery and bury them in the temple.
Among the artifacts on display is a Masonic membership certificate signed by Paul Revere. The silversmith reportedly recruited some brethren for the Boston Tea Party, in 1773. A large painting of George Washington laying the cornerstone for the Capitol and wearing a Masonic apron hangs in the banquet hall. Scores of portraits line a curving mahogany corridor in a sort of I-didn’t-know-he-was-a-Mason gallery: Sam Ervin, John Glenn, Harry Truman, Arnold Palmer, John Wayne and Will Rogers among them. On the first floor is the reconstructed office of FBI director and Mason J. Edgar Hoover.
With its roster of power brokers, Masons have long been accused of political chicanery and undue influence, says Lynn Dumenil, history professor at Occidental College and author of Freemasonry and American Culture, 1880-1930. “Today, it’s all pomp and circumstance. There are no deep dark secrets in the Scottish Rite building.”Yet visitors to the Washington temple pepper tour guides with skeptical questions. Were Masons involved in the Salem witch trials? Is there a secret tunnel connecting the building to the White House? During one recent tour, a guide pressed on a smudged spot on a stone wall just outside the sumptuous Temple Room. The wall gave way, revealing a spiral stairway that snaked up into darkness. A few visitors cautiously stepped forward. Surely, this is a secret passageway to some treasure! Indeed, the stairs lead to the loft for the great pipe organ.
Michael Badnarik – Constitution Class 7 of 7
Michael Badnarik’s Constitution Class – Part 7 59:33
In the early eighties Michael Badnarik started his career as a computer programmer at an Illinois nuclear power plant. For the past twenty years he has continued this professional course, but during this time he became interested and frustrated with politics. As a result, in 1983 Badnarik began studying the IRS and then the constitution. He had since condensed his 18 years of research into a short eight hour course that he would teach in a lecture format. It included some of the fundamentals on our rights and the foundations of our republic.
Michael Badnarik teaches a class on the Constitution. Follow his message of freedom, this is a MUST WATCH!!! Most of what you think you know about the United States is wrong. Think you own your Car? Think its your money? Why do we have to register your car and get plates? Think you own Your property? He explains the differences between rights and privileges.
For the rest of the class Videos Please watch this space or See
http://www.archive.org/details/Michael_Badnarik
Michael Badnarik – Constitution Class 6 of 7
Badnarik Constitution Class Part 6 58:42 – 2 years ago
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=5747171386852909946&hl=en&fs=true
In the early eighties Michael Badnarik started his career as a computer programmer at an Illinois nuclear power plant. For the past twenty years he has continued this professional course, but during this time he became interested and frustrated with politics. As a result, in 1983 Badnarik began studying the IRS and then the constitution. He had since condensed his 18 years of research into a short eight hour course that he would teach in a lecture format. It included some of the fundamentals on our rights and the foundations of our republic.
Michael Badnarik teaches a class on the Constitution. Follow his message of freedom, this is a MUST WATCH!!! Most of what you think you know about the United States is wrong. Think you own your Car? Think its your money? Why do we have to register your car and get plates? Think you own Your property? He explains the differences between rights and privileges.
For the rest of the class Videos Please watch this space or See
http://www.archive.org/details/Michael_Badnarik
Michael Badnarik – Constitution Class 5 of 7
Badnarik Constitution Class Part 5 55:42 – 2 years ago
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=-5876221484028664477&hl=en&fs=true
In the early eighties Michael Badnarik started his career as a computer programmer at an Illinois nuclear power plant. For the past twenty years he has continued this professional course, but during this time he became interested and frustrated with politics. As a result, in 1983 Badnarik began studying the IRS and then the constitution. He had since condensed his 18 years of research into a short eight hour course that he would teach in a lecture format. It included some of the fundamentals on our rights and the foundations of our republic.
Michael Badnarik teaches a class on the Constitution. Follow his message of freedom, this is a MUST WATCH!!! Most of what you think you know about the United States is wrong. Think you own your Car? Think its your money? Why do we have to register your car and get plates? Think you own Your property? He explains the differences between rights and privileges.
For the rest of the class Videos Please watch this space or See
http://www.archive.org/details/Michael_Badnarik
mazanga 